BDTNS 000898 =
imprimir catálogo
Print
Suggestion
Suggestions
Period
Language
Provenance
Object
CDLI
Ur III
Sumerian
Ĝirsu
Tablet
Date
Dates Referenced
Measurements
Seal
0000 - 00 - 00
N
Owner
Museum No.
Accession No.
Excavation No.
Private collection: anonymous, Unknown, Unknown
Publication
Barton, G.A. 
1909 HLC 2 022 (pl. 61) Edition (H
––– 
2021 ePSD P109900 Resource (T
––– 
––– CDLI P109900 Resource 
Author of Transliteration
Transliteration of text 
2001 Maaijer, R. de / Jagersma, B. ( CDLI ) 
Revision of text 
2001→ Molina, M. ( BDTNS ) 
Remarks
This tablet from the Haverford Collection did not reach the Oriental Institute Museum (Chicago), as explained in a letter of Andrew Dix (Assistant Curator of the Tablet Collection) sent to Miguel Civil (2014.03.26), who forwarded it to M. Molina: "There are missing numbers from the HLC publications, so before the tablets were acquired by the OI some were sold separately or "lost." Here are the numbers that are not in the catalogue: 15, 18, 21, 22, 24, 44, 86, 107, 168, 171, 208, 263, 279, 284, 298, 320, 324, 335, 353, 377, and 402. They are missing from the accession file too, so there is no chance that they ever reached the OI. (There are three tablets without HLC numbers [A 32057-32059], so perhaps these could be matched to some of the missing HLC numbers.) (...) One more note about the collection: there is a sub-collection of the Haverford Collection, the Grant Collection, from which there are also missing numbers: 11, 12, 18-21, 25-29, 42, 43, 45, and 48-56. There are also a number of Grant tablets without a Grant Collection number (A 32122-32149) so there is no way to know precisely how many tablets from this sub-collection did not reach the OI (or Haverford College, for that matter). This whole issue came up once before, when one of the Haverford tablets which did not go to the OI appeared in a private collection in South Carolina without any legal paperwork to show how it left the Haverford collection. The OI was contacted about it, and the FBI was involved, but there wasn't any note in the accession file about how the case was resolved (if was resolved at all)".
See now L. Feliu, AuOr 35 (2017) 86f. n. 4.
[M. Molina]
------


Text
 
i 1  ½ Nin-he2-gal2 dumu Nu-IŠ.NI.GIN2
½ Ur-dLamma Nin-ib2-ta-e3
------------
ugula Ur-dingir-ra dumu ta-la
½ Ur-dUš-da-ša dumu Nin-ur5-ra-e
½ nin-GAN2-ga-ni dumu x-bi-še3
------------
ugula Ur-dBa-u2 dumu uš-mu2
½ nin-sag-e-ki-ag2 dumu u8-uduki-ag2
10  ------------
11  ugula Nig2-ša3-ge
12  ½ Nin-a-zu dumu Nin-he2-gal2
13  ------------
14  ugula Lu2-dInanna
15  ½ Lu2-gišgigir dumu Ur-dNin-giš-zi-da
ii 1  ugula Nam-uru-na
½ Geme2-dLamma dumu il2
------------
ugula Ur-sa6-ga
  ============
½ Lu2-dingir-ra dumu GIŠ
½ Uru-ki-bi dumu Ur-dBa-mu-uš-zu
------------
ugula Nimgir-inim-ge-na
½ Ur-giš:dar-kak dumu maš-sila3-LUM-ni-du10
10  ------------
11  ugula Ur-gar
12  ½ Geme2-x-ušur4-ni dumu Bar-ni-si
13  ------------
14  ugula Ur-dNI.TUKU dumu Na-sig3
15  ½ Geme2-bara2-si-ga dumu Nin-a-ni-sa6
16  ½ nin-šu-šu-tur dumu mu-na-gi
17  ------------
18  ugula Lu2-dNa-du3-a
19  ½ Di-ku5-mu-zu dumu Nin-a-UŠ
r. i 1  ugula dNanše-kam
½ dLamma-e-ba-zi dumu Ga-NI-du3
------------
ugula Ba-za-mu
½ 5 sila3 Geme2-dBa-u2 dumu za-li-ih
ugula RI-ge-na
ugula dBa-u2-a-zu
geme2 Ur-dBa-u2 gala
ku3-ta sa10-a
10  ------------
11  Lu2-u2-šim-e
12  0.0.3 Geme2-dGi-sila3-na
13  x maš-e-tuku-a-ta
14  ------------
15  GIN7-sa6-ga i3-dab5
  ============
r. ii   ============
5 sila3 Geme2-ki-siki-ka
dumu Nin-a-ni-sa6
ugula Lu2-dNin-gir2-su
  ============
5 sila3 e2-TE-mu-x
dumu U8-sila4-ki-ag2! (=KA)
------------
ugula Nig2-ša3-ge
½ 5 sila3 arad2 dumu Lugal-za3-ge-si
------------
10  ugula Nam-uru-na